scottsalisbury

• Seed by RANKING not RANDOM View
    by sandstar on January 6, 2018 at 16:56:18 PST
  
  When was the last time TD's discussed seeding for the tourneys by RANKING. It would seem to be much better than RANDOM. What is the argument for RANDOM seeding when we have such good history on peoples RANKING.scottsalisbury
  
  

• Seed by RANKING not RANDOM View
    by HavingFun68 on January 1, 2018 at 11:23:36 PST
  
  When was the last time TD's discussed seeding for the tourneys by RANKING. It would seem to be much better than RANDOM. What is the argument for RANDOM seeding when we have such good history on peoples RANKING.scottsalisbury
  
  
  • Seed by RANKING not RANDOM View
      by HavingFun68 on January 1, 2018 at 11:24:03 PST
    
    When was the last time TD's discussed seeding for the tourneys by RANKING. It would seem to be much better than RANDOM. What is the argument for RANDOM seeding when we have such good history on peoples RANKING.scottsalisbury
    
    
    • Seed by RANKING not RANDOM View
        by HavingFun68 on January 1, 2018 at 11:25:11 PST
      
      Makes no difference because the dice program at Safe Harbor is whacked. I get a fair game there about 1 out of 10 matches. HavingFun68
      
      

• Seed by RANKING not RANDOM View
    by sandstar on December 25, 2017 at 11:58:56 PST
  
  When was the last time TD's discussed seeding for the tourneys by RANKING. It would seem to be much better than RANDOM. What is the argument for RANDOM seeding when we have such good history on peoples RANKING.scottsalisbury
  Scott If that was the case the low guys would never have a chance to catch up. Just my opinion